There have been reports that Sir Keir Starmer's government is looking into deporting illegal migrants to the Balkans. According to The Times, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper met the UN's high commissioner for refugees last month to discuss the idea. It would see the government pay countries in the Balkans to take failed asylum seekers - a prospect ministers hope might discourage people from crossing the Channel in small boats. A total of 9,099 migrants have made that journey so far this year, including more than 700 on Tuesday this week - the highest number on a single day in 2025. One migrant died while trying to make the crossing on Friday. The UN's refugee agency has set out how such hubs could work while meeting its legal standards in a document published earlier this week. It recommended monitoring the hubs to make sure human rights standards are "reliably met". The country hosting the return hub would need to grant temporary legal status for migrants, and the country sending the failed asylum seekers would need to support it to make sure there are "adequate accommodation and reception arrangements". A UK government source said it was a helpful intervention that could make the legal pathway to some form of return hub model smoother. Read more from Sky News:How Japan could shape future of NHSCan the Lib Dems secure election success? It comes after the EU Commission proposed allowing EU members to set up so-called "return hubs" abroad, with member state Italy having already started sending illegal migrants abroad. It sends people with no right to remain to Italian-run detention centres in Albania, something Sir Keir has taken an interest in since coming to power. With Reform UK leading Labour in several opinion polls this year, the prime minister has been talking tough on immigration - but the figures around Channel crossings have made for difficult reading.

Wes Streeting has said he's interested in the idea of "health MOTs" for Britain's older citizens, evoking how the Asian island nation relies on personalised medical plans for its ageing population. Japan combines genomics and AI machine learning to offer hyper-bespoke programmes for individuals, helping to predict and prevent illnesses before they really take hold. Mr Streeting said such an approach could be a "game-changer" in the UK, as he prepares to publish his 10-year plan for the health service later in 2025. He has repeatedly spoken about his desire to move more of the NHS's work out of hospitals and into local communities, focusing more on preventative care than more expensive and invasive emergency treatment. Last year, NHS England - which is due to be scrapped - announced patients over 65 or those with frailty-related conditions would be given health MOTs outside emergency departments to avoid unnecessary admissions. The tests checked for blood pressure, heart health and mobility. Read more from Sky News:Why families face agonising funeral delays'Andrew Tate phenomena' sweeping schools 'A lot of opportunity' Speaking to The Telegraph, the minister said Japan was an "interesting" case study to follow because it's got a "very significant ageing society". Japan's population has been shrinking and growing older for decades as young people delay marriage and having children largely due to unstable jobs and economic difficulties. A 2023 survey found more than 1 in 10 people in Japan were aged 80 or older for the first time. Mr Streeting has reportedly been briefed by an ex-Japanese health official about the country's health programmes. He told The Telegraph while the NHS faced "enormous challenges", he believed advances in technology - notably around artificial intelligence - offered "a lot of opportunity and hope". He said he hoped personalised programmes like Japan's could eventually be offered to everyone in the UK.

In the Oval Office, Donald Trump revealed the news in his own way. "I was invited by the King and the great country. They are going to do a second fest - that's what it is. It is beautiful," he said during an impromptu Oval Office moment. The question was, did this "fest" - which Mr Trump suggested could happen in September - amount to the much hyped second state visit for the American president? Or was this actually just the smaller visit that had been offered two months ago as an initial bilateral visit at which the state visit would be discussed? Back in February, Sir Keir Starmer presented the president with a letter from King Charles and the offer of a state visit. The letter proposed an initial meeting between the King and the president to discuss details of the state visit at either Dumfries House or Balmoral, both in Scotland, close to Mr Trump's golf clubs. The King wrote: "Quite apart from this presenting an opportunity to discuss a wide range of issues of mutual interest, it would also offer a valuable chance to plan a historic second state visit to the United Kingdom… As you will know this is unprecedented by a US president. That is why I would find it helpful for us to be able to discuss, together, a range of options for location and programme content." As he revealed the news of his "fest" with his "friend Charles", Mr Trump said: "I think they are setting a date for September…" Sources have since confirmed to Sky News that it will amount to the full state visit. Read more from Sky News:Man hijacks plane and stabs passengers before being shot deadEvidence contradicts Israel's account of attack on aid workersGang war gripping major cities 'Even more important' It's possible the initial less formal presidential trip may still happen between now and September. Mr Trump is in Europe for the NATO summit in June and is due in Scotland to open a new golf course soon too. "It is the second time it has happened to one person. The reason is we have two separate terms, and it's an honour to be a friend of King Charles and the family, William," the president said. "I don't know how it can be bigger than the last one. The last one was incredible, but they say the next one will be even more important." His last state visit in 2019, at the invitation of the late Queen, drew significant protests epitomised by the giant blow-up "Baby Trump" which floated over Parliament Square. Britain's trump card September is a little earlier than had been expected for the visit. It may be an advantage for it to happen sooner rather than later, given the profoundly consequential and controversial nature of the first few months of his second term. The decision by the British government to play its "state visit trump card" up front back in February drew some criticism. And since February, Mr Trump's position on numerous issues has been increasingly at odds with all of America's allies. On Ukraine, he has seemingly aligned himself closely with Vladimir Putin. His tariffs have caused a global economic shock. And on issues like Greenland and Canada, a member of the Commonwealth, he has generated significant diplomatic shock. A risk worth taking Mr Trump is as divisive among the British public as he is in America. Sir Keir is already walking a political tightrope by choosing the softly softly approach with the White House. 👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈 The UK government chose not to retaliate against Mr Trump's tariffs, unlike some allies. Sir Keir and his cabinet have been at pains not to be seen to criticise the president in any way as they seek to influence him on Ukraine and seek an elusive economic deal on tariffs. On that tariff deal, despite some positive language from the US side and offers on the table, there has yet to be a breakthrough. A continuing challenge is engaging with the president for decisions and agreements only he, not his cabinet, will make. British officials acknowledge the risk the state visit poses. In this presidency, anything could happen between now and September. But they argue British soft power and Mr Trump's fondness for the Royal Family and pomp - or a "fest" as he calls it - amount to vital diplomatic clout. For a special relationship under strain, a special state visit is the tonic.

Rachel Reeves will hold talks with the US next week amid efforts to establish a trade deal, which the government hopes will take the sting out of the president's tariffs. There has been speculation Washington may press the government to limit its dealings with China as part of that deal, having launched a tit-for-tat trade war with its economic rival. But Ms Reeves told The Daily Telegraph:"China is the second-biggest economy in the world, and it would be, I think, very foolish, to not engage. "That's the approach of this government." She suggested she would back the fast fashion firm Shein launching an initial public offering (IPO) in the UK, saying the London Stock Exchange and Financial Conduct Authority have "very strict standards" and "we do want to welcome new listings". Shein, which was founded in China but is now based in Singapore, has faced several obstacles to its efforts to float, including UK political pressure over alleged supply chain and labour abuses. Read more from Sky News:Trump says he might give up on Ukraine peace talksPub hours extended for 80th VE Day celebrationsHow Japan could shape the future of the NHS 'Productive discussions' When it comes to a UK-US deal, The Daily Telegraph has reported officials in Washington believe an agreement could be weeks away. But on Thursday, Mr Trump said he was in "no rush" to reach any deals because of the revenues his new tariffs are generating. During Sir Keir's call with the US president on Friday, the two leaders talked about the "ongoing and productive discussions" on trade between the two nations, according to a Downing Street spokesperson. "The prime minister reiterated his commitment to free and open trade and the importance of protecting the national interest," Number 10 said. As well as the 10% levy on all goods imported to America from the UK, Mr Trump enacted a 25% levy on car imports.

But if they did, they may be heartened by some of what they hear. Take the interview Kemi Badenoch gave to the TRIGGERnometry show in February. Ten minutes into the episode, one of the hosts recounts a conversation with a Tory MP who said the party lost the last election to the Lib Dems because they went too far to the right. Everyone laughs. Then in March, in a conversation with the Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson, the Tory leader was asked to describe a Liberal Democrat. "Somebody who is good at fixing their church roof," said Ms Badenoch. She meant it as a negative. Lib Dems now mention it every time you go near any of them with a TV camera. The pitch is clear, the stunts are naff At times, party figures seem somewhat astonished the Tories don't view them as more of a threat, given they were beaten by them in swathes of their traditional heartlands last year. Going forward, the pitch is clear. Sir Ed Davey wants to replace the Tories as the party of middle England. One way he's trying to do that is through somewhat naff and very much twee campaign stunts. To open this local election race, the Lib Dem leader straddled a hobbyhorse and galloped through a blue fence. More recently, he's brandished a sausage, hopped aboard a rollercoaster and planted wildflowers. Senior Lib Dems say they are "constantly asking" whether this is the correct strategy, especially given the hardship being faced by many in the country. They maintain it is helping get their message out though, according to the evidence they have. "I think you can take the issues that matter to voters seriously while not taking yourself too seriously, and I also think it's a way of engaging people who are turned off by politics," said Sir Ed. 'What if people don't want grown-ups?' In that way, the Lib Dems are fishing in a similar pool of voters to Reform UK, albeit from the other side of the water's edge. Indeed, talk to Lib Dem MPs, and they say while some Reform supporters they meet would never vote for a party with the word "liberal" in its name, others are motivated more by generalised anger than any traditional political ideology. These people, the MPs say, can be persuaded. But this group also shows a broader risk to the Lib Dem approach. Put simply, are they simply too nice for the fractured times we live in? "The Lib Dems want to be the grown-ups in the room," says Joe Twyman, director of Delta Poll. "We like to think that the grown-ups in the room will be rewarded… but what if people don't want grown-ups in the room, what if people want kids shitting on the floor?" A plan that looks different to the status quo The party's answer to this is that they are alive to the trap Lib Dems have walked into in the past of adopting a technocratic tone and blandly telling the public every issue is a "bit more complicated" than it seems. One senior figure says the Lib Dems are trying to do something quite unusual for a progressive centre-left party in making a broader emotional argument about why the public should pick them. This source says that approach runs through the stunts but also through the focus on care and the party leader's personal connection to the issue. Presenting a plan that looks different to the status quo is another way to try to stand apart. It's why there has been a focus on attacking Donald Trump and talking up the EU recently, two areas left unoccupied by the main parties. The focus on local campaigning But beyond the national strategy, Lib Dems believe it's their local campaigning that really reaps rewards. In the run-up to the last election, several more regional press officers were recruited. Many stories pumped out by the media office now have a focus on data that can be broken down to a constituency level and given to local news outlets. Party sources say there has also been a concerted attempt to get away from the cliche of the Lib Dems constantly calling for parliament to be recalled. "They beat us to it," said one staffer of the recent recall to debate British Steel. 'Gail's bakery rule' This focus on the local is helped by the fact many Lib Dem constituencies now look somewhat similar. That was evidenced by the apparent "Gail's bakery rule" last year, in which any constituency with a branch of the upmarket pastry purveyor had activists heaped on it. The similarities have helped the Lib Dems get away from another cliche - that of the somewhat opportunist targeting of different areas with very different messages. "There is a certain consistency in where we won that helps explain that higher vote retention," said Lib Dem president Lord Pack. "Look at leaflets in different constituencies [last year] and they were much more consistent than previous elections… the messages are fundamentally the same in a way that was not always the case in the past." A bottom-up campaign machine New MPs have also been tasked with demonstrating delivery and focusing doggedly on the issues that matter to their constituents. One Home Counties MP says he wants to be able to send out leaflets by 2027, saying "everyone in this constituency knows someone who has been helped by their local Lib Dem". In the run-up to last year's vote, strategists gave the example of the Lib Dem candidate who was invited to a local ribbon-cutting ceremony in place of the sitting Tory MP as proof of how the party can ingratiate itself into communities. With that in mind, the aim for these local elections is to pick up councillors in the places the party now has new MPs, allowing them to dig in further and keep building a bottom-up campaign machine. 'Anyone but Labour or Conservative' But what of the next general election? Senior Lib Dems are confident of holding their current 72 seats. They also point to the fact 20 of their 27 second-place finishes currently have a Conservative MP. Those will be the main focus, along with the 43 seats in which they finished third. There's also an acronym brewing to describe the approach - ABLOC or "Anyone but Labour or Conservative". 9% swing could make Sir Ed leader of the opposition The hope is for the political forces to align and Reform UK to continue splitting the Tory vote while unpopularity with the Labour government and Conservative opposition triggers some to jump ship. A recent pamphlet by Lord Pack showed if the Tories did not make progress against the other parties, just 25 gains from them by the Lib Dems - the equivalent of a 9% swing - would be enough to make Sir Ed leader of the opposition. What's more, a majority of these seats would be in the South East and South West, where the party has already picked up big wins. As for the overall aim of all this, Lord Pack is candid the Lib Dems shouldn't view a hung parliament as the best way to achieve the big prize of electoral reform because they almost always end badly for the smaller party. Instead, the Lib Dem president suggests the potential fragmentation of politics could bring electoral reform closer in a more natural way. "What percentage share of the vote is the most popular party going to get at the next general election, it's quite plausible that that will be under 30%. Our political system can't cope with that sort of world," he said. Whether Ms Badenoch will still be laughing then remains to be seen. This is part of a series of local election previews with the five major parties. All five have been invited to take part.