Emergency services were called to Brighton seafront at around 5.45am last Wednesday, where three bodies were then found in the water. Sisters Jane Adetoro, 36, Christina Walters, 32, and Rebecca Walters, 31, from the Uxbridge area, north west London, were named by Sussex Police on Wednesday. In a statement released via the force, their father Joseph said losing his daughters "has left an emptiness that words cannot heal". "No words can truly describe the pain of losing three daughters in the prime of their lives," the statement read. "Jane, Christina, and Becky were more than daughters to me; they were my joy, my strength, and the beautiful light that filled our family with happiness and love." Describing each of his children as "unique and precious in your own special way", Joseph added: "Your smiles brightened dark days, your laughter brought comfort, and your presence made life more meaningful. "Though your time on earth was short, the impact you made will remain in our hearts forever. "Jane, your strength and loving spirit will never be forgotten. Christina, your kindness and beautiful heart touched so many lives. Becky, your warmth and joyful soul brought happiness wherever you went. You were deeply loved, and you will always be deeply missed." Read more:Southampton 'spygate' - what happened?Two men jailed over London drive-by shooting He continued: "The tragedy of losing all three of you has left an emptiness that words cannot heal. There are days when the grief feels unbearable, yet I hold tightly to the memories we shared - the laughter, the conversations, the love, and the bond that death can never take away. "Though you are no longer here beside us, your spirits live on in our hearts every day. Love like yours never dies. You will forever remain a part of our lives, our prayers, and our memories." An investigation into how the women ended up in the water is ongoing. Police have said there is "no evidence to suggest third-party involvement or criminality" at this time. The force is appealing for anyone with information to come forward, particularly members of the public who may have seen the women around the Madeira Drive area of Brighton between 10pm on Tuesday 12 May and 5.30am the following day. Chief Superintendent Adam Hays, divisional commander for Brighton and Hove, said: "I'd like to reassure the public we will leave no stone unturned in our investigation to understand exactly what led to the tragic events of that Wednesday morning. "This investigation will continue in earnest, with Jane, Christina and Rebecca's family at its centre. I would ask that they are given the privacy to come to terms with this terrible tragedy."

MPs on the Culture, Media and Sport (CMS) Committee wrote to the organisations after two women alleged they had been raped and another made claims of sexual misconduct to BBC's Panorama programme. All three said the Channel 4 show, made by production company CPL, did not do enough to protect them. Channel 4 boss Priya Dogra said on Wednesday she was "deeply sorry" for the distress caused to Married At First Sight UK participants who alleged they were raped and sexually assaulted by their partners. Ms Dogra said a review into contributor welfare was now under way and there were "limitations" on what she could say until this was complete in late summer. Ms Dogra added: "That said, I have watched the programme and heard the women's accounts which are very troubling. "Their distress is clear, and for that I am, of course, deeply sorry. "Welfare across all our programmes is hugely important to us, and is a primary concern. The apology comes as a psychologist who previously worked on the programme has said more "transparency" is needed to protect contestants after women made allegations of rape and sexual assault. Psychologist Jo Hemmings said that despite protocols and welfare practices being "very tight", she felt there were gaps between what psychologists would recommend and what was broadcast. Speaking to the PA, Ms Hemmings said contestants should be allowed to see some footage or request that certain footage was not shown because welfare "should be at the heart of everything that the production team does". Channel 4 and CPL have been approached for comment. 'Urgent questions to answer' Dame Caroline Dinenage, chair of the Culture, Media and Sport (CMS) Committee, has questioned whether "enough is being done" to "protect people taking part in reality television". She said: "The horrifying allegations about Married At First Sight raise serious concerns over whether enough is being done to protect people taking part in reality television. "Both Channel 4 and Ofcom, as the broadcasting regulator, have urgent questions to answer." The letter to Channel 4 also asks about its complaints process for contestants on the programme and the steps taken to ensure the allegations were fully investigated, along with the review announced by the broadcaster. On Tuesday, the Metropolitan Police urged potential victims of sexual assault on the reality TV show to get in touch. The broadcaster said it had removed all previous seasons of MAFS UK from its streaming platforms. The move follows an external review, commissioned by the broadcaster in April, into the welfare of participants on the programme. The government has said all the allegations must be investigated and that "there are consequences for criminality or wrongdoing". Read more from Sky News:Air conditioning will become 'unavoidable' in parts of EnglandUnemployment rate ticks up to 5% Shona Manderson - the third of the three women making allegations about their time on the Channel 4 show, and the only one who is named - said she "completely lost her light" while appearing in the series. The show sees single people matched by experts and then "marry", with couples meeting for the first time on their wedding day. The "marriages" on the show are not legally binding but the couples go on a "honeymoon" and move in together after their weddings. Ms Manderson's on-screen partner Bradley Skelly told the BBC's Panorama he categorically denies "any allegations of sexual misconduct, or that he was controlling". In a statement on Wednesday, Channel 4 chief content officer Ian Katz said the broadcaster "ensured that women involved were kept safe when any issues were raised to us" and were given "appropriate support". All three men deny the allegations.

A random ballot which gives MPs the chance to propose their own new laws will be drawn on Thursday morning. Those MPs who come in the top few positions in the ballot have a decent chance of their bills passing. Politics Hub: Follow the latest If a supporter of assisted dying comes high up in the ballot on Thursday - ideally first place - they plan to bring the bill back and give it a second chance of becoming law. Kim Leadbeater, the backbench Labour MP who previously sponsored the bill, told Sky News MPs should do their "democratic duty" and bring back the bill. But opponents believe the wind is changing against the bill, and that MPs won't want to spend more time on the controversial piece of legislation. Recent changes to the law made via the private members bill ballot include making it illegal to sneak into a football match without a ticket and a crackdown on the smuggling of dogs, cats and ferrets. Ms Leadbeater came first in this ballot the last time it was drawn in summer 2024. Her bill, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, would have given people over 18 who are terminally ill, and in the final six months of their life, the ability to request assistance from a doctor to die. That bill ran out of time to become law in April, after being held up in the House of Lords who refused to agree to it. Opponents say it doesn't contain enough safeguards to protect vulnerable people from being coerced into seeking an assisted death. But because of a piece of procedure called the Parliament Act - which says a bill passed by MPs in two consecutive sessions but rejected by peers becomes law anyway - if a supporter is successful in Thursday's ballot, the bill has a good chance of passing. What is the chance of the bill coming back? A random ballot could decide whether the legislation gets a second chance. Sky News understands supporters think between 80 and 100 MPs would definitely reintroduce it. Backers of assisted dying have previously told Sky News they plan to enlist 200 supportive MPs to enter the ballot to try to bring it back. But Sky News understands the core group who would definitely reintroduce the bill is smaller. If none of this core group come high up enough in the ballot, they'll seek to persuade any sympathetic MPs who do come in the top few spots that they should be the one to bring the bill back. Supporters think that an already sympathetic MP would be keen to put their name to what they think is a monumental piece of legislation - but others have suggested the controversy surrounding the topic may put MPs off. Ms Leadbeater wrote to MPs last week, saying "it is vital that as many colleagues as possible enter the ballot and are prepared to sponsor the bill if successful". Speaking to Sky News on the eve of the ballot, Ms Leadbeater said it would "give parliament the chance to reach a final decision on this hugely significant piece of legislation, as it should". She added: "As polling has shown consistently for many years, this is what the vast majority of the public are asking for, and it is our democratic duty to do everything we can to respect their wishes and give dying people choice, dignity and compassion in their final few months of life." Many MPs and peers, including some opposed to assisted dying, are outraged that the Lords failed to pass the bill, given it was agreed by elected MPs. Ms Leadbeater said that over 200 peers backed bringing the bill back. One Labour MP told Sky News that while there is "fatigue" with how long the bill is taking to pass, that was a "tactic" by peers opposed to the bill to stop it becoming law. "Their mission from the start has been to slow down, frustrate and dismantle the bill at every opportunity in an underhand and undemocratic way," the MP said. But others fear taking on what has become a controversial topic. One Labour aide told Sky News that while the "vast majority of MPs who backed the assisted dying bill in the last session remain supportive", many Labour MPs "appear to be unwilling to resurrect the bill in the next session if they are successful in the ballot". A separate letter from 15 opposing Labour MPs, led by senior backbencher Dame Meg Hillier, said it would be "misguided and damaging" to bring the bill back, and a "distraction" from the work of the government. Labour MP Jess Asato told Sky News: "The last thing Labour MPs should be focusing on right now is continuing to debate this deeply divisive, flawed and risky bill rather than delivering on the priorities of voters." What if they can't bring the bill back using the ballot? If no core supporter comes high up enough in the ballot, and backers aren't able to persuade a sympathetic MP to take on the controversial legislation, they could seek to use a different type of backbench bill, called a presentation bill, to bring it back. But this would have a much smaller chance of becoming law, as these don't usually pass beyond the next first stage - and supporters would have to persuade the government to give it time on the grounds of protecting the authority of the democratically elected Commons over the unelected Lords. Ministers are understood to have rejected formally taking on the bill as government legislation, as they fear splitting the Labour Party over an issue its MPs disagree on. Even if supporters are successful in the ballot on Thursday, the bill would still face many more months of scrutiny in parliament. But supporters hope that it would be the first step in finally changing the law.

As a result, Hull City will take on Middlesbrough in Saturday's play-off final, with the Wembley showpiece kicking off at 3.30pm. On Tuesday evening, Southampton were expelled from the Championship play-offs, with Middlesbrough reinstated, after a member of the Saints' backroom staff was caught watching Boro's training ahead of the first leg of their play-off semi-final. How Spygate incident unfolded | EFL & 'Spygate' latestSouthampton expelled from Championship play-offs According to the EFL, Southampton admitted "multiple breaches" relating to the unauthorised filming of their opponents' training ahead of games against Oxford and Ipswich, as well as the clash with Middlesbrough. In addition to their expulsion from Saturday's final, Southampton were handed a four-point deduction for next season. Reacting to their expulsion, Southampton called the ruling "manifestly disproportionate" to the offence. The Saints appealed the ruling, but it was dismissed on Wednesday night with no further opportunity of appeal. An EFL statement read: "A League Arbitration Panel has today dismissed Southampton Football Club's appeal against the Independent Disciplinary Commission's decision in respect of breaches of EFL Regulations. "As a result, the original sanction remains in force. Southampton's expulsion from the Sky Bet Championship Play-Offs stands, alongside the four-point deduction to be applied to the Club's 2026/27 Championship record and the reprimand in respect of all charges. "In accordance with EFL Regulations, the decision of the League Arbitration Panel is final. Following the conclusion of the proceedings, the Sky Bet Championship Play-Off Final between Hull City and Middlesbrough is confirmed as taking place at Wembley Stadium on Saturday 23 May, kicking off at 3.30pm." 'Extremely disappointing outcome' - Southampton statement Shortly after the announcement, Southampton released a statement saying it was an 'extremely disappointing outcome', while also acknowledging it was a painful moment for the club and they would be determined to 'put things right'. It read: "Southampton Football Club has this evening been informed that the EFL's League Arbitration Panel has upheld the sanctions imposed earlier this week. As a result, the club will not participate in Saturday's Championship Play-Off Final. "This is an extremely disappointing outcome for everybody connected with Southampton Football Club. We know how painful this moment will be for our supporters, players, staff, commercial partners and the wider community who have given so much backing to the team throughout the season and we apologise once again to everyone impacted by this. "While we fully acknowledge the seriousness of this matter and the scrutiny that has followed, the club has consistently believed the original sporting sanction was disproportionate, a view that has been widely shared by many in the football community over the last 24 hours. "We would like to place on record our sincere thanks to our supporters for the support, patience and loyalty they have shown throughout an incredibly difficult period. We will share information as soon as possible in relation to ticket refunds for those who bought tickets to Wembley. "Southampton Football Club has a proud history and strong foundations, but it is clear that trust now needs to be rebuilt. That work begins immediately. The club will reflect carefully on the events that have led to this point, learn from them and take the necessary steps to move forward responsibly. "While tonight is a painful moment, this football club will respond with humility, accountability and determination to put things right." 'We now have clarity on final... but there could be further consequences down the road' Sky Sports News' chief correspondent Kaveh Solhekol: "Southampton's lawyers did their best to argue their case in front of this new league arbitration panel, which was effectively an appeal panel. They would have said that the punishment is far too severe. "They would have cited incidents in the past where a team has been deducted six points for spying, or Leeds United were fined £200,000, but now we know that the appeal panel decided to stick with the initial decision that the disciplinary commission came up with yesterday, which is that the punishment is proportionate. "Now I know a lot of people in football, ex-players, managers, supporters are looking at this and saying, 'Wow, this is a big, big punishment for something that can be viewed as being not that big in the grand scheme of things.' "However, two panels now, the disciplinary commission and the appeal panel, have disagreed with what people have been saying and said, 'No, this is very, very serious. Southampton have to be expelled from the play-offs'. "We will get more clarity when the full written reasons are released, not just of the commission yesterday, but also of the appeal. "Everybody will be able to go through it. It will be available on the EFL website as well. You can read through it, see all the evidence, and make up your mind. "But finally, three days before the play-off final, we now have absolute clarity that it will be Hull City vs Middlesbrough, and not Southampton, at Wembley on Saturday. And Southampton, unfortunately, because of this spying scandal, which they have admitted to potentially going to cost them a place in the Premier League, and £200m, and there could be further consequences down the road. "I think the FA may well now get involved, because the EFL don't have the power to charge or punish individuals, but the Football Association does, and they can use that power once the EFL process has ended. "The EFL process has now run its course. So, I wonder if in the next few days and weeks the FA will get involved and say 'We need to have a look at this, we need to find out who was involved in this, who knew about this, who orchestrated it, who took part in it, who oversaw it, and should they be charged with bringing the game into disrepute?' "Because in the past, we've seen people who have been involved in spying on opponents be given one-year bans from football by FIFA." Spygate timeline: How did we get here? May 7: Middlesbrough make formal complaint to the EFL alleging a Southampton member of staff spied on their training session three days before their Championship play-off semi-final first leg. May 9: Boro boss Kim Hellberg accuses Southampton of cheating after the first leg ends in a 0-0 draw at the Riverside Stadium. May 12: Southampton charged with a breach of EFL regulations in relation to the spying accusations. Southampton request additional time to conduct an internal review. The play-off semi-final second leg is played at St Mary's. Shea Charles' extra-time winner earns Southampton a 2-1 victory and a place in the Championship play-off final. Emotional Hellberg hits out at "disgraceful spying", before Saints boss Tonda Eckert storms out of his press conference after being asked: "Are you a cheat?" May 13: Photos allegedly showing the Southampton analyst near Middlesbrough's training ground released publicly. May 14: It is announced the independent hearing to determine Southampton's fate will take place on or before Tuesday May 19. In a statement, the EFL say "the outcome of the disciplinary proceedings may yet result in changes to the fixture." May 15: Middlesbrough publicly call for Southampton's expulsion from the play-offs. In a statement, they said: "In these circumstances, the only appropriate response is a sporting sanction which would prevent Southampton FC from participating in the EFL Championship play-off final." May 18: Middlesbrough players return to training as the outcome of the independent disciplinary hearing nears. May 19: EFL announces Southampton expelled from play-off final after hearing. May 20: Southampton appeal hearing verdict but it's dismissed.

Youri Tielemans, Emi Buendia and England international Morgan Rogers scored the goals in a 3-0 win to ensure Villa claimed their first major trophy in 30 years - and a first European title since 1982. Prince William, an avid supporter of the West Midlands club, was among the fans celebrating in the stands at Tupras Stadium on Wednesday night. The result means Villa manager, Unai Emery, has now won the Europa League a record five times, having previously lifted the trophy on three occasions with Sevilla and once with Villarreal. "It's hard to put into words," Rogers said after the game. "You work so hard for this and we all delivered. It's a great moment for the fans and for the club." Tielemans shared his teammate's sentiment: "It's amazing. It has been a season with a lot of ups and downs. The way we turned things around, it's a credit to the players and to the staff." The Belgian midfielder opened the scoring for Villa before Buendia netted a second with a sublime strike from the edge of the box on the stroke of half time. Rogers added a third 12 minutes after the restart to secure an impressive victory for the Premier League side. Hundreds of Villa fans who This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version. You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

The mixed martial arts event, billed as UFC Freedom 250, is also to mark the upcoming 250th anniversary of American independence on 4 July. Here's everything you need to know about the first-ever set of fights at the White House. Who's on the card? Two title bouts top the White House fight card: • Ilia Topuria vs Justin Gaethje - UFC Lightweight Title (unification) • Alex Pereira vs Ciryl Gane - Interim UFC Heavyweight Title Georgian-Spanish fighter Ilia Topuria is undefeated going into his latest showdown, with seven KO wins and eight submissions on his impressive resume. The 29-year-old is the only UFC fighter to have won titles in two divisions without suffering a loss, having vacated a featherweight championship to go up to lightweight in 2025, where he beat Charles Oliveira for the vacant lightweight belt. In his way of another historic victory is interim champion Justin Gaethje. The veteran US fighter, 37, has an impressive record of 27 wins - 20 by KO - and five losses. He's a two-time Interim UFC Lightweight Champion, having won the title in May 2020 and January 2026. The other main event sees Brazilian powerhouse Alex Pereira attempting to be the first fighter in UFC history to win a title in three weight classes. He will face Ciryl Gane, a former interim champion and three-time heavyweight title challenger with interim gold on the line. Those fights will be preceded by five non-title battles: • Sean O'Malley vs Aiemann Zahabi - Bantamweight • Mauricio Ruffy vs Michael Chandler - Lightweight • Bo Nickal vs Kyle Daukaus - Middleweight • Diego Lopes vs Steve Garcia - Featherweight Are tickets available? The famous UFC octagon cage will be erected on the South Lawn of the White House, and there will be around 4,000 people there to see it, according to UFC president Dana White. In a press conference earlier in May, he said Mr Trump would receive 1,000 tickets to hand out; Mr White and TKO Group CEO Ari Emanuel would have 200 each and the remaining tickets would be distributed across branches of the military. But the UFC has committed to issuing 85,000 free tickets to watch the event on eight large screens in Ellipse Park, which is across the street from the White House. Those hoping to watch on the big screens can request tickets on the event's official page until Saturday 23 May at 4.59am UK time. Why the White House? Donald Trump first outlined his plans for a White House UFC event on Independence Day last year, telling a celebrating crowd in Iowa: "So every one of our national parks, battlefields and historic sites are going to have special events in honour of America 250. And I even think we're going to have a UFC fight. ″Think of this on the grounds of the White House," he said, adding that it would be a "full fight" with 20,000 to 25,000 people watching live. Mr Trump has long been a fan of the sport, and was the first sitting president to attend a UFC show, watching a 2019 fight that was stopped because of a cut over the loser's eye that left blood pouring down the fighter's face. Read more:Pending tax claims against Trump to be droppedEverything you need to know about the World Cup 2026 After his election victory, he attended a fight with House Speaker Mike Johnson and a large political entourage in New York, and he also went to further UFC bouts in Newark and Miami last year. On why he enjoys the sport, he told podcaster Logan Paul as he campaigned for his second term: "I have respect for fighters, you know, when you can take 200 shots to the face and then look forward to the second round." Mr Trump is also a close friend of Dana White's. When is it - and how can I watch it? The preliminary fights will take place from 9pm Sunday 14 June BST, with the main card scheduled to start at 1am BST on Monday morning. The main events will be available to watch on TNT Sports with a subscription, while the earlier fights can be seen with a UFC Fight Pass.

The controversial move comes following the election of the first two trans MSPs to Holyrood - the Scottish Greens' Iris Duane and Q Manivannan. Sky News understands the parliament initially added a non-binary category in addition to male and female to accommodate Manivannan, but then questions were raised over Duane being listed in the female section. The gender filter search function has now been removed completely, sparking complaints from women's rights campaigners and a number of politicians. The Scottish parliament said the filter function was a "legacy system" that had been removed as part of an ongoing Inclusive Parliament Review. Scottish Conservative MSPs Rachael Hamilton and Meghan Gallacher have written to Holyrood's presiding officer, Kenneth Gibson, to express their "concern". The pair wrote: "As female MSPs, we believe it is important that women continue to be clearly and transparently represented within the parliament's official records and public-facing information. "The removal of female as a distinct category risks undermining the visibility of women's representation in public life and makes it more difficult to accurately assess progress relating to female participation within Scottish politics. "At a time when there is ongoing public discussion around the importance of sex-based data and representation, we believe the Scottish parliament should lead by example in ensuring that women are not erased or obscured within official systems and reporting mechanisms." Read more from Sky News:'Serious concerns' raised by MPs after rape allegations on MAFSDiplomat who stood in after Mandelson sacking abruptly leaves post The MSPs have asked for clarification about why the change was made and if there are plans to reinstate the search function. Scottish Labour MSP Carol Mochan added that the removal of the filter limits the information that helps people choose if they would rather speak to a male or female representative in their region. She too has written to the presiding officer to ask for a further explanation, adding: "Erasing women doesn't mean we will shut up and go away." A Scottish parliament spokesperson said: "As part of the Inclusive Parliament Review, our systems and processes are currently under review. "The online filter function on our website is a legacy system and we have taken steps to remove it. "The review will also consider what personal information on members we need to publish and in what format."

Following three runners-up finishes, the Gunners sealed top spot after Manchester City drew 1-1 at Bournemouth. Arsenal have topped the table for much of the season, but their title bid looked to have hit shaky ground in April. A 2-1 defeat at Man City seemed to hand the title advantage to Pep Guardiola's side but the Gunners rallied and have held off City to win the league for the first time since the Invincibles in the 2003/04 season. The title ends a six-year period without a trophy and is Arteta's second major honour as manager at the Emirates Stadium. Arsenal news & transfers🔴⚪ | Arsenal fixtures & scoresFREE Arsenal Premier League highlights ▶️Got Sky? Watch Arsenal games LIVE on your phone📱Not got Sky? Get Sky Sports or stream with no contract on NOW 📺Choose the Sky Sports push notifications you want! 🔔 Midfielder Declan Rice posted a picture on Instagram with his team-mates with the caption "I told you all.. it's done." Captain Martin Odegaard was pictured on Eberechi Eze's Instagram with the Arsenal bottle that a Manchester City fan made viral at Stamford Bridge in a dig that the Gunners were 'bottling' the title. Former Gunners boss Arsene Wenger, who led the team to their last title, in 2004, featured in a celebratory post from the Gunners on their X account. He said: "You did it. Champions go on when others stop. This is your time. Now, go on and enjoy every moment." Former Arsenal striker Alan Smith, a two-time title-winner, said he was thrilled to see his former club finally get over the line after several near misses in recent seasons. "Brilliant! It's fully deserved, said Sky Sports' Smith, who was co-commentator for City's draw on Tuesday. "Arsenal have had the best defence - they haven't had the best attack - but as an overall unit Mikel Arteta has done incredibly well." There could be more silverware on the horizon for Arsenal as they bid to win the Champions League for the first time in the club's history. "You have to have nervy moments when you haven't won it for that long and Arsenal did have them," Smith added. "But hopefully now they can play with freedom. "It almost feels that the Champions League final is a free hit now." The Gunners face defending champions PSG in the Champions League final in Budapest on Saturday May 30. In pictures: Arsenal players celebrate... When will Arsenal get the trophy? Arsenal will be presented with the Premier League trophy after their final game of the season at Crystal Palace on Sunday. When were Arsenal last crowned Premier League champions? It has been a long wait for the red side of north London. Arsenal last won the Premier League title back in the 2003/04 season when Arsene Wenger's side went through the whole league season unbeaten. It was the third title of the Wenger era but a special one as the Gunners secured 26 wins and 12 draws on their way to becoming the Invincibles. How social media reacted... Your View - What fans make of Arsenal's title win 'Perhaps now, the shackles may be off' Whatever people may say, Arsenal just needed to get it done. They tried going toe-to-toe with City and Liverpool, playing more expansive football. It failed them. They just needed to get a title one way or another. Perhaps now, the shackles may be off. [SG91] 'Arsenal can dominate for years to come' Credit to Arteta sometimes in projects there are delays, and you have to be patient. Arsenal have won the league, they can take advantage of this moment and dominate for years to come, especially since Pep is leaving. [SunaStats] 'Team of corners and Gabriel goals' Team of corners and Gabriel goals. Utterly disappointed and sad it didn't go to the last day. [UTV] 'Arteta deserves so much credit' It's probably the worst footballing team to win the title in the last 10 years or so, but Arteta deserves so much credit. They stuck it out and are Premier League champions and in the final of the Champions League, The rolling about and time wasting needs to stop though. [Itsourturn] 'Dull, boring, anti-football' Dull, boring, anti-football. Terrible advert for the Premier League. [Andrew] Arsenal's remaining fixturesSunday May 24: Crystal Palace (A) - Premier League, kick-off 4pm (live on Sky Sports)Saturday May 30: PSG (Puskas Arena, Budapest) - Champions League final, kick-off 5pm